The Red Palm Weevil and The Real World Evil

http://www.palms.org/palmsjournal/2002/redweevil.htm

 

 

The Red Palm Weevil in the Mediterranean Area	M. FERRY AND S. GÓMEZ Estación Phoenix, Apartado 996, 03201 Elche, Spain
The red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier, has become the most important pest of the date palm in the world (Gomez & Ferry 1998).	Vol. 46, No 4, Palms (formerly Principes), Journal of the International Palm Society © 2002 The International Palm Society, All rights reserved

 

Originating in southern Asia and Melanesia, where it is a serious pest of coconuts, this weevil has been advancing westwards very rapidly since the mid 1980s. It had reached the eastern region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1985 (pers. obs.) and afterwards spread to many other areas in the Kingdom (Abozuhairah et al. 1996). The pest was first recorded in the northern United Arab Emirates in 1985, and since then it has spread to almost the entire U.A.E. (El-Ezaby 1997) and to Oman. In Iran, it was recorded in Savaran region in 1990 (Faghih 1996). Then it was discovered in Egypt at the end of November 1992 in El-Hussinia, Sharquiya region (Cox 1993). In 1994, it had been captured in the south of Spain (Barranco et al. 1996) and in 1999 had been found in Israel, Jordan and the Palestinian Authority Territories (Kehat 1999). The cause of the high rate of spread of this pest is human intervention, by transporting infested young or adult date palm trees and offshoots from contaminated to uninfected areas. In this article we present the current situation of the red palm weevil in Spain, Egypt and the Near East, to demonstrate the seriousness of this pest and the high risk of its arrival in other Mediterranean countries. In these countries, the two main palm species concerned are Phoenix dactylifera and P. canariensis, the main crop and ornamental species in the Mediterranean area, but it could attack some others ornamental palms (Barranco et al. 2000). Our purpose is to emphasise the need for urgent and strong prophylactic measures to avoid new catastrophes and for the reinforcement of co-operative international research against this pest. The red palm weevil is a member of Coleoptera: Curculionidae. The male and female adults are large reddish brown beetles about 3 cm long and with a characteristic long curved rostrum; with strong wings, they are capable of undertaking long flights. Damage to palms is produced mainly by the larvae. Adult females lay about 200 eggs at the base of young leaves or in wounds to the leaves and trunks; the grubs feed on the soft fibers and terminal bud tissues. They reach a size of more than 5 cm before pupation. Except just before pupating, they move towards the interior of the palm making tunnels and large cavities. They can be found in any place within the palm, even in the very base of the trunk where the roots emerge. Pupation occurs generally outside the trunk, at the base of the palms. The larva pupates in a cocoon made of brown dried palm fibres. Overlapping generations with all life stages can be present within the same palm tree. Generally the adult weevils present in a palm will not move to another one while they can feed on it. Usually the damage caused by the larvae is visible only long after infection, and by the time the first symptoms of the attack appear, they are so serious that they generally result in the death of the tree. This late detection of the presence of the weevil constitutes a serious problem in the fight against the pest and in any attempt to guarantee pest-free status in adult trees. Despite research carried out so far, no safe techniques for early detection of the pest have been devised. In Spain, very soon after the red palm weevil killed the first Phoenix canariensis in some gardens of Almuñecar, the relevant authorities initiated various actions to combat the pest. Intensive chemical treatments have been used to protect the Phoenix palms and to try to cure affected trees. Despite the difficulty in operating in the public gardens environment, foliage spraying has been conducted with various insecticides: Fenitrotion, Clorpirifos, Diazinon or Metidation. Preventive treatment of all the palms, even healthy ones, has been repeated once a month outside the tourist season. Insecticides such as carbaril and imidacloprid have been injected several times and in various places all around the stems of palms. Simultaneously, a programme of mass trapping using aggregation pheromone and semi-synthetic kairomone has been initiated (Esteban-Durán et al. 1998). But despite all these efforts, more than one thousand Phoenix have been killed. In an area that extends from Motril to Nerja, in the Mediterranean coast of Granada and Málaga, the weevil is still present and has spread to villages close to the initial points of infection. There is every evidence to suggest that the first weevils were introduced into Spain from adult palms imported from Egypt. Before the arrival of the weevil in the south of Spain, Egypt was the westernmost place where the red palm weevil has been recorded. Furthermore, as the importation of palms from Egypt was not prohibited, Egypt has been the main source of supply of ornamental adult Phoenix palms to satisfy the very substantial demand that exists in all the coastal cities of Spain and, more generally, of southern Europe. In Egypt itself, the introduction of the red palm weevil was caused by an importation of offshoots from the United Arab Emirates. At the beginning, the extension of this pest into Egypt was restricted to a limited number of locations in two northeastern provinces. In 1995, three years after its first discovery in Egypt, an Egyptian agriculture official considered that the red palm weevil had been eradicated (Ferry 1996). Unfortunately, this announcement was erroneous. In the two provinces where the pest was first recorded, the red palm weevil continues to infect and kill new date palms year after year, despite all the efforts developed to combat it. Various techniques have been used to try to control the red palm weevil (pheromone traps) and to save infested date palms (chemical control by pouring pesticides into the trunk and injection of entomopathogenic nematodes (Shamseldean 1994)). Despite good results of these techniques in the laboratory, they are not efficient enough in the field to succeed in eliminating red palm weevil. The reason for this is probably the great difficulty in reaching all life stages of the weevil inside an adult palm tree, even with intensive and repeated stem injections or perfusions. Furthermore, such intensive activity is impossible for economic and practical reasons in places with a large number of date palms. In Egypt, as well as in the south of Spain, the elimination of infested trees has not been applied systematically as soon as the pest were detected. The possibility of saving these trees and avoiding serious economic consequences as a result of their elimination, and the practical difficulties of carrying out this operation have unfortunately limited or delayed the destruction of infested trees. The affected trees have then constituted an important focus for further spread of the red palm weevil. At present the situation in Egypt is very worrying. Although a small number of date palms are affected, red palm weevils have been recorded in each of the Delta administrative districts, as well as in some orchards along the road between Cairo and Alexandria and even in the capital itself. This extension is certainly partly due to the difficulty of implementing a ban on the exchange or transplanting of offshoots or ornamental adult palms as a rigorous prophylactic measure. Although the red palm weevil does not usually fly very much in the orchards where it is present, it probably flies to new orchards when, after killing all the existing date palms, it does not find enough food. In Israel, early detection of the pest, when the number of affected trees was still very limited, resulted very quickly in the establishment of a program of integrated pest management. Substantial financial and human resources have been dedicated to avoiding the spread of the pest. Each new affected tree is immediately eliminated. More that 4000 pheromone traps have been located at a high density in 450 ha date plantations along the Jordan Valley. The incorporation of the systemic pesticide Confidor in the irrigation water has also been used. Despite all these efforts, newly infested trees are still being recorded, three years after the first detection of the pest, and red palm weevils are still being caught in traps. Conclusions Even when important and costly means are dedicated to combat the red palm weevil, an efficient solution to fight against it when it first arrives is still missing However, the main ornamental tall palms planted in the gardens and in the streets of the Mediterranean coast cities are date palms. Thousands of them are imported from Egypt each year directly or indirectly into Spain and other European countries. These palms must have a phytosanitary passport but in specimens such as adult date palms, a large quantity of hidden insects and diseases, can evidently remain undetected, even after very careful phytosanitary scrutiny, and this is, of course, the case red palm weevil eggs and larvae. In response to the appearance of the red palm weevil in the south of Spain, the Spanish government promulgated a decree in 1996 forbidding the importation of palms from countries where pests of the group of Rhynchophorus have been recorded. Four years later this decree was modified, and one of the consequences has been that importation of date palms from Egypt is no longer illegal. This modification to the decree was probably made partly because adult date palms were still arriving in Spain from neighboring countries, with the disappearance of the border controls between European Union member countries. The market for adult date palms from Egypt is very lucrative. It also seems difficult to convince decision-makers and individuals to wait until specimens grown locally became tall enough for landscaping, instead of asking for palms from Egypt. For these two reasons, we think that there is a need for phytosanitary regulations at a European and North African country level to forbid totally the importation of date palms. Otherwise disasters such as the one that has occurred in Almuñecar or, worse still, the one that continues to develop in Egypt, are probable in other places around the Mediterranean. Such disasters could occur in the coastal cities where Phoenix palms constitute one of the characteristic landscape elements; from there, it could extend to the important inland date palm groves of North Africa. It could be also a catastrophe in Elche where the date grove has been nominated as a World Heritage Site. We consider also that European research centers should contribute to help all countries affected by red palm weevil to find a solution to combat this pest. LITERATURE CITED      http://www.palms.org/palmsjournal/2002/redweevil.htm

---

1. Adult red palm weevil.   2. Larva in a date palm trunk. 3. Adult red palm weevil emerging from its cocoon. 4. Damage to a leaf base.

 

 

 The Real World Evil

 

 

Globalists/Internationalists advocate for a World Government in the form of uniting statal/national/governmental organisations in a hierarchy of power (indeed not power sharing) throughout the world having a central Regulator. In response to the following cataclysms, which they claim will effect the whole world in an exponential manner throughout this century, they offer their solution: -

 

 Cataclysmic variables

(1)   Population growth, Immigration and Multiculturalism

(2)   Climate Change

(3)  Food and Water scarcity

(4)  Ethics and technological evolution

(5)  Information control

(6)  BRIC vs G6 world economic dominance

(7)  Terrorism and wars

(8)  Corporate mergers, acquisitions and global shareholders

(9)  Global Economic Recession and Depression

 

 

Globalist and Internationalist work seems to indicate the following solutions for the above mentioned future exponential variables:-

 

(1)   A One World Government (taking place gradually)

(2)   A One World Religion (evidenced by the writings and teachings of all major cults and sects)

(3)   A World President, King or Leader (conspirational, possible but unfounded – hoped for especially by Babylonian styled cults i.e. Freemasonry)

 

However, the three ‘Ones’ must first become a reality in the E.U. (and maybe in the future North American Union and Asian Union, and in the present silent African Union) On July 9, 2002 fifty-three African Nations formed the intergovernmental organisation referred to as the African Union. An Asian Union is also forming. During the present N. American political campaign these interrogations from the public have been posed. Such Unions are indeed being created. 

 

 

 

EU Goals :-

(As suggested by Mr Shai Moses of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in his paper presented at the Helmut Kohl Institute for European Studies.)

 

‘When Deepening Encounters Widening: Supranational Governance in the

Enlarged European Union – the Case of the Constitutional Discourse’ Feb 2005.

 

 

(1)   the replacement of the ‘weighted votes’ system by ‘double majority voting’

 

 

(2)   reducing the number of European commissioners

 

(3)   the abolishment of veto power

(4)   the establishment of a president of the European Council

(5)   the establishment of a new EU foreign minister

(6)   the development of European economic policy

 

 

 

Coincidentally, the Lisbon Treaty incorporates all these points – if I am indeed in error I invite any reader to elucidate in the comments section!! 

Just to make matters clear I am not a Eurosceptic, I believe in the European Union, especially due to the similarity in the origins of most E.U. Nations, however I disagree with the direction the E.U. seems to be steering.

In my humble opinion, (of a blogger), from the point of view of the E.U. Nation the following issues are indeed threatened:-

 

(1)   sovereignity

(2)   independent economic and market policy

(3)  independent foreign policy

(4)  political autonomous jurisdiction

(5)   legal, religious and ethical self-governance

(6) sovereign decisions for self-defence, vis-à-vis foreign policy.